My husband and I are currently writing a book about the life and work of an extraordinary and complicated man. His name was Dr. John R. Schmidt, and he’s mostly known in medical circles around the world as the physician who changed how leprosy is treated on the planet today.

I knew him as my father.

We have many boxes of letters, personal diaries, journals, newspaper articles and books that reveal the life of John Schmidt. My mother handed them over to me in May of 2006, three years after my father died. “You’re my writer, Marlena. Some day I want you to write the story of our lives,” she said.

At the time I had no intention of doing so, but I took the boxes (What was I to say: “Sorry, Mom, I Don’t Want Your Stuff?”).

They now fill an entire wall of shelves in our writing studio.

In sorting through the material, we have uncovered details about my father that I never knew. The discoveries have helped me understand the man more fully, which I expected. But they have also triggered joy, sadness, discomfort and other emotions that I didn’t expect at all. It often surprises me how powerfully the past can invade the present.

The story of my father’s life has also sparked a number of questions that I believe are universal. Questions having to do with faith, money, power, war and family, to name a few. I will explore some of these issues in my first series of blog posts in 2019.

But first, a personal note about what it feels like to read intimate details a parent leaves behind in writing.

For a very long time, people have struggled with the question about whether “to read, or not to read” private written documents after the death of the writer. I’m privileged to have received permission to read my parents’ personal accounts. In fact, I was left with the charge to do so.

And yet, I still sometimes feel like a peeping Tom, peering into intimacies I have no right to see.

My parents kept personal diaries almost their entire lives, from their childhood in the early 1920s, to just a few years before they died, he in 2003, she seven years later.

Many entries are boring and repetitive (“Woke up. Baked bread. Went to church.”). Some are angry outbursts. Others are intimate confidences. The details recorded in the personal writings of a lifetime weave together a familiar story for those who knew my strong-willed and determined father. But they also reveal an inner life, at times tender and loving, at times filled with torment and confusion. These were not things the world associated with the powerful public persona of Dr. John R. Schmidt.

For me, the honor of seeing his inner life is a gift, laced with a bit of unease and a lot of both pride and compassion.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This