When I mention to my women friends that Ed and I snuggle for hours every morning before we get up, they often respond, “Oh, my husband wouldn’t like to do that.Sex is what he wants when I lie awake next to him.”
But here’s the thing: Even though we often stereotype women as the cuddlers in our culture, women tend to have many more opportunities for human touch than men. They affectionately touch their friends and family members with less associated stigma than men might encounter were they to do the same.
So, men may be more touch-starved than women. Isn’t it therefore possible that touching and cuddling could be even more important for men’s satisfaction in and commitment to the marriage than it is for women?
In fact, researchers, from the Kinsey Institute in Bloomington, IN, recently surveyed more than 1,000 couples from the U.S. and four other countries to determine what factors predicted relationship satisfaction. All study participants reported being in their current relationships for an average of 25 years.
They found the opposite of what they expected: Non-sexual kissing, cuddling and caressing were better predictors of satisfaction with the relationship for men than for women inthe study.
Quite a few psychologists, not involved in the research, continue to be intrigued by the finding that men with long-term partners need touch and affection to be happy in their relationships. Indeed, stereotypes are hard to break, especially if we don’t talk about them.
Maybe it’s time we quit pigeonholing our men in ways that might no longer be true, and pay attention to their deep-seated, though often unspoken, needs for touch.
I am married to Marlena. I am so blessed not to be touch starved. And yet as much touching as we do I seldom feel like I have quite enough and regularly look forward to more.
Am I alone in this as a man? Do others of you have this experience?
Ed, for me not having “quite enough” probably means I welcome more, but perhaps don’t need more. Like my relationship with chocolate. (I believe there are some neurotransmitters involved here.) But yes, I am not surprised that men were found to endorse touch as elemental. Regarding skin-touch as described by Marlena and amplified by Pat in the last blog, I think the safe space agreement is critical. Naked does not equal sex. Repeat. Could young couples do this? Well, many have after being urged to address their sexual conflict by following the ‘no-demand’ practices of Masters and Johnson. For us, skin-touch is its own reward, not a prelude. In truth, we skip some mornings. Busy, busy. No blame, no fret. We’ll get back to it.
Carl, thank you so much for providing another man’s perspective. It adds so much to this conversation! Safe space – ah yes. You are mirroring the last blog post this week about touch and vulnerability.